music @blog (new site)

[demt]

Sum music and a few words all done in a bit of a hurry sum people say its near pro, Id like your comments.

DEMT

[Terminator1138]

I would love to say something about the site...too bad there is not a link or more hints to give me a clue on where I might find it :)

[dabbler]

20 questions? [only yes/no answers allowed!]

1. Is it on the internet yet?

[PsychoticDude85]

after number one:

2. Is this custom made or blogger/msn spaces?

[demt]

I'll start again, music@ a few words garanteed to blow your mind,and mine,

@ www.twra5t.co.uk

sorry about the obvious side effects (c earlier post) your comments mutch appreciated.

[PsychoticDude85]

No layout to speak of, little content, poor coding (a table row each for links!!), very little content, no explanation of what the tracks are, there is barely anything to rate sorry. Also why is this called a blog really, there is no narritive involved as far as I can tell...

The links would be better in a CSS styled list e.g. in the head:

<style type="text/css">
ul {
list-style-type: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
li {
padding: 6px 0 6px 0;
}
</style>
then for the links themselves instead of tables:

<ul>
<li><a href="#" title="Description">Track</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="Description">Track</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="Description">Track</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="Description">Track</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="Description">Track</a></li>
</ul>

The links could also do with styling in my opinion this can be an addition to the CSS:

a {
color: #ddd;
background: inherit;
}
a:hover {
color: #fff;
background: inherit;
}

[demt]

apoligies see new thread
DEMT www.twra5t.co.uk

[demt]

layout is user friendly
content 20mins of music and a few words
coding /c table rows is delibrate as im adding stuff all the time
music is not 4 explaining unless youve got a docterate @ a very long time
rate /sum people think im pro 20 years plus
blogs /anything goes blogs
the head is 4 the search engine the body is a website not a series of songs
your code is not css
for the links c above
styling is optional within css
css is generally cheaper than other codes
anything else?


DEMT

[PsychoticDude85]

1. My point is that it looks bad, some people get it right like maddox but that is just poor.
2. Exactly a bit of music is all that's there, no one will visit that site often, it's just few tracks.
3. Tables are not for the whole layout EVER, they are only for tables, your whole layout is generated with them.
4. What about artist? album? duration? filesize? You have NOTHING.
5. Then they know very little about websites
6. Not convinced but that was an unimportant side-comment.
7. Then you know nothing about coding html, go here before you make yourself look stupider. w3schools (http://www.w3schools.com/)
8. Again you obviously know nothing about CSS, look into what they are before you say something like that, both the top and bottom code samples were CSS.
9. CASCADING STYLE SHEETS, Look them up dammit
10. Styling is important, the lack is what makes your page tacky.
11. huh? elaborate?
12. More poor coding, you have 7 clear errors in your code http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//www.twra5t.co.uk/, Your grammar and spelling on the page suck, and the main picture is of a low quality.

Please look into things before acting superior, you aren't.

[Terminator1138]

Would been more appropriate to post on your earlier thread instead of a new one! Now for me, I could not get the site to load sorry no comments yet from me :)

Update: I merged the two created threads...

[dabbler]

By and large I have to concur with PsychoticDude85.

There is little content,as yet, and no clear point to the site.

As for coding, validator found 7 errors, HtmlTidy found 80 warnings! YES 80, in just the small amount of coding that is there.

It is good that you are having a try at making a webpage, but you do need to study the basics of html and add css for the style.

Who is the picture of, by the way? (Even alt text in the tag would help.)

[Terminator1138]

I still cannot get to the pages....I'm using FFox. Is the address correct?

[Tarmithius]

@Term: I can get to the page and concur with PS and Dabbler on all points.

[Terminator1138]

Weird, I just cannot get to the site...will try IE and see if that works.

Nope not in IE, but google did find it,...weird..oh well..

[PsychoticDude85]

Term: http://alex-elliott.com/demt.jpg

[Terminator1138]

Thanks :) For the most part cannot figure it all out why it gives me not found. :(

[demt]

DONT WORRY the HTML only cost £2.50 c alleycode free html editer @core ftp

This site is obviously for coding freaks only still i will check sum of the others later

The musics worth a fortune and the words aint far off .Video of the band later(animation), +female porn star/musician in a guest spot/ All i hope is you like the music

[PsychoticDude85]

Dude, I tried to give you a tip and you implied that I was ignorant? Not cool, this is supposed to help but you just insulted me saying I didn't even know what CSS was!

I was trying to help you improve the code but you blew my off completely. But since you asked, no not my style of music.

[Terminator1138]

Demt, you put this in reviews and showcase and some will give you their honest opinion...If you cannot take constructive comments, then I'm sorry to say you must have stated be gentle on the front of your post. The comments given are only to help you develop your site. Errors cause things not to show up correctly and only helps you get more users in the end.

If you wanted to show off the music perhaps the best thing was not to put in the reviews area. Just a thought.

Alex, I'm not sure about the CSS, maybe the posted editted them...i dont see any reference to css in the posts

[PsychoticDude85]

"your code is not css" - post #8

[Terminator1138]

Thank you, I needed to read more in the above post,

[demt]

sorry im new to site building il fix the code over a period of time as im very busy with the music
theris internet radio and tv to be added later+podcasting so if you want an ad/jingle for
your sitestraming away 24hours a day give us ashout

[demt]

right its not in css its html,

[PsychoticDude85]

right its not in css its html,
Dude, everyone here knows you are wrong, why do you continue to make yourself look stupid?

CSS is the abbreviated for of Cascading Style Sheets, CSS is a language like HTML, but while they can be used in the same file they are DIFFERENT. Is Javascript now HTML because you can put it in <script type="text/javascript"></script> tags withing the HTML?

No that's right, it's not it's still Javascript. Now look a little harder at the code I posted and you will see it says type="text/css" the main part being "text/css". Would it ease your mind if I said, put it in a remote file of style.css with <link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">? CSS is still CSS wherever you put it, and if you want to carry on arguing I will throw every point you have back in your face and laugh.

Now stop trying to prove me wrong and making yourself look arrogant and stupid and get used to the fact that I know a lot about CSS, so I definately know what it is. On the subject here is the link from w3schools made by the World Wide Web Consortium, that's right the people who manage the whole area of webstandards, which explains it to you, even you can't argue with the group in charge of webstandards.

http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_intro.asp